Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:04:01 -0500 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: Duke Normandin <01031149@3web.net> Cc: charon@hades.hell.gr, "keramida@ceid.upatras.gr" <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Firewall: ipfw or natd Message-ID: <20000117210401.B63571@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <SAK.2000.01.17.mcqdpmhe@webserver>; from 01031149@3web.net on Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 01:51:38PM -0700 References: <SAK.2000.01.17.mcqdpmhe@webserver>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 01:51:38PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote: > On 01/17/2000 6:03:50 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > >On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 06:24:04PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote: > >> > >> What criterion (ia) are used for determining the use of ipfw or natd > >> in creating a firewall? TIA.. > > > >You can use both on the same `firewall'. > > > >They are two different programs, with a different purpose each. > > > > I gathered as much now....thanks! I'm now curious to read the answer to the post with > the subject line, "ipf/ipnat vs ipfw/natd", as well as determining whether or not > natd's `divert' capabality has (can have) anyhting to do with firewalling. ipfw(8) has "divert" capability. You must have ipfw enabled and divert rules in place in order to use natd(8). -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000117210401.B63571>