Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:58:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: randy@psg.com Cc: fullermd@over-yonder.net Subject: Re: bind timeouts Message-ID: <200405182258.i4IMwl7E021722@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 May, Don Lewis wrote: > On 18 May, Randy Bush wrote: >>>> no. it means an MX referring to a CNAME which resolves to an A >>> Not by my reading. >> >> then maybe try reading rfc 2181 sec 10.3 > > This part of RFC 2181 is a fairly substantial change from RFC 974, which > is interesting because RFC 2181 also says: s/2181/2821/ in the above sentence. > Abstract > > This document is a self-contained specification of the basic protocol > for the Internet electronic mail transport. It consolidates, updates > and clarifies, but doesn't add new or change existing functionality > of the following: > > - the original SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) specification of > RFC 821 [30], > > - domain name system requirements and implications for mail > transport from RFC 1035 [22] and RFC 974 [27],
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405182258.i4IMwl7E021722>