Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      13 Jun 2003 23:28:59 -0400
From:      "Brandon S. Allbery " KF8NH <allbery@ece.cmu.edu>
To:        peter lageotakes <plageotakes@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvsup with tag=. on src and upgrading (in general)
Message-ID:  <1055561339.57938.1.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030614031557.94662.qmail@web14603.mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <20030614031557.94662.qmail@web14603.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 23:15, peter lageotakes wrote:
> that only the tag=. is relevant for the ports
> collection.
> </quote>
> 
> But the quote below is says: 
> Note: The ports tree does not have any tag associated
> with it, it is always CURRENT.
> 
> I guess it means that it will just delete and install
> the ports collection no matter what the tag points
> too.

No, it means that there are no tag values that are meaningful for
ports-all; you need to use tag=. (no tag, meaning retrieve the HEAD) or
the ports collection will be deleted by cvsup because there are no files
with the tag you specified.

-- 
brandon s allbery [openafs/solaris/japh/freebsd] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [linux/heimdal/too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering                              KF8NH
carnegie mellon university  [better check the oblivious first -ke6sls]



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1055561339.57938.1.camel>