Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 17:13:54 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/procfs procfs_ctl.c Message-ID: <xzp1y1pd9vh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200303021607.h22G7NIg053401@grimreaper.grondar.org> (Mark Murray's message of "Sun, 02 Mar 2003 16:07:22 %2B0000") References: <200303021607.h22G7NIg053401@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> writes: > Can't we redefine caddr_t as void* instead? That seems to make a bunch > more sense for what caddr_t is actually used for. No, you'll get a lot of warnings and errors due to caddr_t being used in pointer arithmetic. I'd rather we got rid of it altogether (as discussed many times on -arch). I started doing this a year ago but gave up because I was trying to do too much (mechanically remove it from the entire tree) and lots of stuff broke. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-src" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1y1pd9vh.fsf>