Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:28:15 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> Cc: Putinas Piliponis <putinas.piliponis@icnspot.net> Subject: Re: system lockup - ata spurious interrupts - somehow updated Message-ID: <405FD8FF.2070703@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200403230053.i2N0rQsg069996@ambrisko.com> References: <200403230053.i2N0rQsg069996@ambrisko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Soren Schmidt writes: > | That said, the ICH5 support is written "blindfolded" as I do not have > | any such HW here in the lab. So if there is a problem with ATA on those, > | someone with the HW and enough kernel clue should look into it (or > | someone could land the needed HW in my lab, which could also bring > | support for the SW RAID on intel's)... > > I have some patches for ICH5 for the IDE and SATA parts of it based > on stable. I haven't ported them to -current yet but I should be > starting to work on that soon. I have patches for the 6300ESB ICH > as well. They are basically the same SW wise except for pci ids. > > There is nothing major in the patches except for PCI id's and > reading the DMA setup. I do have tweaks that read the SATA status > registers and which drives are mapped to which ports. This prevents > system lock ups when the SATA drives go away. > > I just got my hands a system that looks like it might have the Intel > RAID in BIOS stuff to play with. If you get anything done let me know so we can get it reviewed and possibly committed to -current. I dont have patches for the 6300 here locally as well, thats just PCI ids... -- -Søren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?405FD8FF.2070703>