Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:27:56 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 64 bit times revisited..
Message-ID:  <3BDA1BAC.6DD81122@mindspring.com>
References:  <2912.1004113233@critter.freebsd.dk> <3BD993A6.E6B12512@mindspring.com> <20011026214703.K96876@daemon.ninth-circle.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> 
> -On [20011026 18:49], Terry Lambert (tlambert2@mindspring.com) wrote:
> >According to you, that won't bite anyone for 10 years.
> 
> I have heard arguments like this before.
> 
> ``The solution is temporary.''
> ``But we will replace this with the correct stuff in a few
> days/weeks/months/years.''
> 
> 10 years passes quickly has been my experience and I rather have a good
> solution than one which fills the gap for 10 years now and that we get
> this entire revisitation 10 years from now.
> 
> But that's my personal belief and observations.

You need to read the entire discussion.

He was attacking a solution that was "only good for 10 years",
in favor of one that was "only good for 37 years".

I was being ironic.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BDA1BAC.6DD81122>