Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Jul 2012 06:36:32 -0700
From:      Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: aio in GENERIC?
Message-ID:  <500D5360.80607@feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <500D028F.2040904@freebsd.org>
References:  <3CE55F29-A5B2-44A7-8854-1ED38BAE6F16@FreeBSD.org> <50075072.5050906@gmail.com> <500752CD.9030107@feral.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207221752310.83786@fledge.watson.org> <500D028F.2040904@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for all of the responses to my simplistic query. I really wanted 
to know what others thought about this. Way back in the day when I was 
splitting my programming time between Unix, RT-11 and RSX-11, I was much 
frustrated with Unix not having asynchronous I/O at the application 
level. Then when Unix acquired it, it was buggy forever. Then we got 
multithreaded applications, to a first approximation that seemed good 
enough. The scalability issue makes sense.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?500D5360.80607>