Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:06:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Leon Me??ner <l.messner@physik.tu-berlin.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and "silly rename" Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006121904160.28836@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <20100612150915.GN13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20100606144443.GA50876@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> <8639wsk4t1.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20100612141549.GM13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006121112150.4460@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> <20100612150915.GN13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note > that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater then 1. > This might cause the silly rename to kick in some time where it should > not, but the race is rare. > I'd say that having silly rename happen once in a while for unlink when it doesn't have to happen is better than having the file deleted on the server while it is still open on the client. rickhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.63.1006121904160.28836>