Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:11:16 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please test: Secure ports tree updating Message-ID: <xzp654wiffv.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <417EAC7E.2040103@wadham.ox.ac.uk> (Colin Percival's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:58:54 %2B0100") References: <417EAC7E.2040103@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes: > CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. if cvsup is slow, you're not using it right. I'm sure portsnap is a wonderful piece of software, but there's no need to spread FUD about cvsup to promote it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp654wiffv.fsf>