Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:23:32 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: vivek@CS.Princeton.EDU Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD Message-ID: <20031026121527.K2023@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <1067183332.3f9bece4c0cf4@webmail.cs.princeton.edu> References: <1066789354.21430.39.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1067183332.3f9bece4c0cf4@webmail.cs.princeton.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 vivek@CS.Princeton.EDU wrote: > Details about what we have so far are at > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~yruan/debox/ > > Yaoping Ruan had mentioned this on the list before (and sent a > pointer to the sendfile patches), but didn't seem to get much > response. > > -Vivek As always, you're seeing the lack of available committer time, not a real lack of interest. One way to accelerate the process might be for someone (not necessarily you, any reader of this mailing list could do it) to show that this change visibly benefits some easy to run benchmark. Some simple setup of apachebench vs thttpd (which uses sendfile, afaik) would be useful for this purpose. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031026121527.K2023>