Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:07:35 +1000
From: Tony Maher <anthony.maher@uts.edu.au>
To: Gary Kline <kline@sage.thought.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com>
Subject: Re: optimization levels for 6-STABLE build{kernel,world}
Message-ID: <45089D47.6070005@uts.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <20060913234934.GA92067@thought.org>
References: <200609130905.k8D95idk062789@lurza.secnetix.de> <4507CC9B.60704@sun-fish.com> <20060913234934.GA92067@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Kline wrote: > <deleted> > > A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any > negative consequences? (I can't imagine how:: but better > informed than to have something crash inexplicability.) > With 6.X safe at -O2 and with -funroll-loops, that should be > a slight gain, right? (It also will make an upgrade from 5.5 > to 6.[12] that much more rational.) -funroll-loops affect loader see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-September/028145.html -- tonym
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45089D47.6070005>