Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:         Sun, 10 Nov 96 22:26 PST
From:      Denis DeLaRoca (310) 825-4580        <CSP1DWD@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU>
To:        Bill Fenner <fenner@PARC.XEROX.COM>
Cc:        current@FREEBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Re: bpf-1.1, libpcap-0.2.1 and tcpdump-3.2.1
Message-ID:  <199611110626.WAA19564@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:57:47 PST,
   Bill Fenner <fenner@PARC.XEROX.COM> said:
> In message <199611100951.BAA26958@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
>
> There are several diff's between bpf-1.1 and the bpf that's in the FreeBSD
> tree.  Some of them seem to be the same thing done in different ways,
> some of them might be different functionality.  Is there anything specific
> that bpf-1.1 does that FreeBSD's doesn't that you need?

Humm? The bpf-1.1 change log shows fixes for various ioctl bugs, fixes
for promiscuous mode handling, a fix with the handling of BIOCSRTIMEOUT
whihc may or may not be relevant to the FreeBSD version... but perhaps
the bpf filter (minor) fixes are more relevant?

My only concern was to have the bpf code as of up to date and bug-free
as possible.

-- Denis




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611110626.WAA19564>