Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 00:27:20 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc33: snapshots -> final release Message-ID: <1120861640.91809.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507090003340.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507082349240.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <1120859884.91809.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507090003340.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gerald Pfeifer p=ED=B9e v so 09. 07. 2005 v 00:04 +0200:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > This looks like decreating PKGVERSION to me, because 3.3.6.20050511 is
> > more than 3.3.6. You will have to add PORTEPOCH=3D1 or something.
>=20
> This is why I wrote the following above my patch in my original message.=20
> ;-)
>=20
> >> I've got a proto-patch which looks as follows, but simply removing=20
> >> PORTREVISION is bad in terms of version comparisons as far as I can
> >> see.
> >>=20
> >> Would changing the revision from "20050511" to "release" work?
>=20
> Would that work?
No, because
$ pkg_version -t 3.3.6.20050511 3.3.6.release
>
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
It's time for the penguin on top of your television set to explode.
--=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCzv3IntdYP8FOsoIRApBlAJ0cGb8WnvjTqA6/DYIh0WdUxjBqWgCeO0l+
ZtE0XN3WghY+RBmj3lQOGAY=
=9XCx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1120861640.91809.15.camel>