Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:52:43 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: mutexes and modules Message-ID: <15899.37499.534870.510847@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030107174322.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <15899.21130.772170.901252@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <XFMail.20030107174322.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin writes: > > On 07-Jan-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Are kernel modules pessimized in any way with respect to using > > mutexes as compared to statically compiled kernel code? > > > > I seem to remember some discussion a year or more ago indicating that > > they would be, but I'm not seeing it in the code. > > In the non debug case the quick cases are not inlined in modules but > are always function calls. Other than that there isn't much difference. Thanks John.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15899.37499.534870.510847>