Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:53:10 +0100 From: Matteo Riondato <rionda@gufi.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <1073998390.18384.19.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp3cakul86.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <xzp3cakul86.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Il Mar, 2004-01-13 alle 12:44, Dag-Erling Smørgrav ha scritto: > Antal Rutz <arutz@mimoza.pantel.net> writes: > > I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD. > > I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or > > bi-monthly. > > 2) have somebody keep track of everything that happens and write it > down. Nobody has volunteered so far (though bmah@ does it to some > extent with the release notes) Just to give my own opinion: For normal -CURRENT user who haven't a real in-depth knowledge of the system, is not easy to understand what every single commit message means, especially those in regard to difficul topics such as VM development or network device drivers development. That's probably why nobody has volunteered to write a Status Report. It (the Status Report) should be a work both of users _and_ developers. These are my 0.2 euro Best Regards -- Rionda aka Matteo Riondato G.U.F.I Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) BSD-FAQ-it Main Developer (http://www.gufi.org/~rionda) GPG key at: http://www.riondabsd.net/riondagpg.asc Sent from: kaiser.sig11.org running FreeBSD-5.2-CURRENT [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAA+o22Mp4pR7Fa+wRAgSNAKC6D04yXlvCOJyrHBak0WOIDSB4XwCgk8HQ r9R/bw+TKmsZjyvZHFf/ggs= =7/e1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1073998390.18384.19.camel>