Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:01:46 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: set kern.cam.scsi_delay to 2000ms on all platforms Message-ID: <422A732A-355A-4C18-9E8F-8C7D2EE9D122@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <4CC046B8.8000505@feral.com> References: <20101019221131.GA75368@freebsd.org> <63EF6D51-1196-43F1-8521-27756E972263@samsco.org> <20101021062150.GA20489@freebsd.org> <8B967C79-CD84-435C-9007-E33467DC92A9@samsco.org> <20101021135447.GC72290@freebsd.org> <4CC046B8.8000505@feral.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Sure, but what's the plan for validating it? Too often this stuff goes into HEAD with the best of intentions, and then it basically never touched again until someone stumbles over it in an release. I'm not against this change, I just want to know what engineering has gone into it. Scott On Oct 21, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Now would be a good time to find out if there are issues. > >> On Thu Oct 21 10, Scott Long wrote: >>> Ok, I've gotta be a stick in the mud and ask you how you've come to the conclusion that 2000 is better than 5000. Can you provide your evidence and/or testing results? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?422A732A-355A-4C18-9E8F-8C7D2EE9D122>