Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:14:58 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org>, julian@elischer.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <45494692.5090200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611011935540.9245@sea.ntplx.net> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611011935540.9245@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> I have noticed that libpthread shared library version number in 6-STABLE >> and 7-CURRENT is the same (.2), which causes all threaded application >> compiled for 6-STABLE to segfault when executed on 7-CURRENT system, >> unless libpthread.so.2 is replaced with with its 6-STABLE version which >> in turn will create problems with threaded apps compiled for 7-CURRENT. >> IMHO we should increase version number in 7-CURRENT, so that it is in >> the line of what we have for other system libraries. > > It should be done as part of a larger set of library version bumps. > All libraries should be bumped. I believe kan and kensmith were > suppose to be looking at that. We wanted to enable symble versioning > by default, so all libraries would need to be bumped. Well, as I said the rest of the libs have already been bumped between 6.x and 7.x, I don't know if libpthread is exception. Perhaps somebody just missed it out? -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45494692.5090200>