Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:20:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric AUGE <eric.auge@cw.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/52758: bogus default IP route (netstat -rn/route add) handling/display. Message-ID: <200305290320.h4T3KDRZ060554@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/52758; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric AUGE <eric.auge@cw.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Eric AUGE <eauge@fr.cw.net>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/52758: bogus default IP route (netstat -rn/route add) handling/display. Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 05:13:53 +0200 (CEST) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 28 May 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ru >There's nothing unexpected here; route(8) displays non-contiguous ru >netmasks this way: key&netmask. The default route is the route ru >with both key and mask of all zeroes, by definition. When you ru >specify a third argument (netmask), it becomes non-default, but ru >rather a ``-net 0 -netmask <netmask>''. ok i didn't know about the output format, and i didn't know why i was believing that it did check if the next hop was within the address space of one the interfaces (physical or logical). thanks bringing this to me, i might have just missed it in route(8). Best Regards, Eric. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+1Xr0L/U5psk9l1gRAsgNAJ9DL/DNdyKjvi/dmc0OkNDyhm6vrACgntgC zfxWUYytTG/VFuldLToGcFA= =EKhN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305290320.h4T3KDRZ060554>