Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:35:18 +0100 From: "qoska kotfare" <seditaniedi@gmail.com> To: "Marko Zec" <zec@tel.fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multipath Routing Message-ID: <2d8af7bc0612101335r74644527ucfa2d696cdde84b7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200612101438.33014.zec@tel.fer.hr> References: <2d8af7bc0612100520g5672bfebh32c7a08de2db81c3@mail.gmail.com> <200612101438.33014.zec@tel.fer.hr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/10/06, Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr> wrote: > On Sunday 10 December 2006 14:20, qoska kotfare wrote: > > Can anybody give a status if we have any p4 or any effort on > > supporting/importing this from KAME?! > > > > OpenBSD and lately NetBSD have imported these and i remeber a post > > from ~2005 where andre@ and Marko(Virtual Stacks implementor on 4.X) > > discussed how to implement something similar to these days, and they > > where discussing to implement something similar like Cisco VRF. > > Any effort going on this?! > > I'm working on virtualizing the network stack for -CURRENT in p4, but this > project is focused primarily on virtualizing the existing networking state / > code, not on introducing new features like multipath routing. > > Marko > Well glad your continuing to support these tools. But my focus was more toward routing table virtualization cause it seems a must nowdays! Even in router requirements as requested by RFC/STD. More MultiWan would be a lot easier if such features exist if you don't wanna have the hassles with BFP or other routing protocols. Anyway i hope any other report will show up on such thing :-).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2d8af7bc0612101335r74644527ucfa2d696cdde84b7>