Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:44:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> In-Reply-To: <200010032346.RAA31311@harmony.village.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>
> In message <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes:
> : I 4.1(.1) I get:
> :
> : ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1
> : ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit)
> :
>
> This is a big clue that something bad is wrong.
>
> Warner
>
Warner is right...
Just to verify things further - I hardcoded the mac address in
if_ed.c:ed_get_Linksys() (wrapping an #if 0 around the code
that gets it before and simply setting the bytes in
sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[].)
This worked beautifully - and my laptop is no `on the net.'
The code for this in the 3.4 PAO is:
/*
* 0x14-0x19 : Physical Address Register 0-5 (PAR0-PAR5)
* 0x1A : Card ID Register (CIR)
* 0x1B : Check Sum Register (SR)
*/
for (sum = 0, i = 0x4; i < 0xc; i++)
sum += inb(sc->asic_addr + i);
if (sum != 0xff)
return 0; /* invalid DL10019C */
for (i = 0; i < ETHER_ADDR_LEN; i++) {
sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[i] = inb(sc->asic_addr + 0x4 + i);
/* printf("%02x.", sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[i]); */
}
return 2;
while the code for this in 4.1.1 is:
/*
* Linksys registers(offset from ASIC base)
*
* 0x04-0x09 : Physical Address Register 0-5 (PAR0-PAR5)
* 0x0A : Card ID Register (CIR)
* 0x0B : Check Sum Register (SR)
*/
for (sum = 0, i = 0x04; i < 0x0c; i++)
sum += ed_asic_inb(sc, i);
if (sum != 0xff)
return (0); /* invalid DL10019C */
for (i = 0; i < ETHER_ADDR_LEN; i++) {
sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[i] = ed_asic_inb(sc, 0x04 + i);
}
it turns out that `sum' was not 0xff (but 0x51) as it should have
been... but, everything looks just fine to me... (of course, I'm
not "up" on the busifying of everything - so I'm not sure
if ed_asic_inb() actually expands to the same things as the
basic inb() was in 3.4.)
But - this seems to be the place for the difficulties...
- Dave Rivers -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010041144.HAA84948>