Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:52:44 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Sten Spans <sten@blinkenlights.nl> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: special test request for 6.1-BETA1 on ATA disks Message-ID: <20060216225244.GC49268@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0602162322290.969@tea.blinkenlights.nl> References: <20060215231911.GB42943@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060216190512.GA47748@freebie.xs4all.nl> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0602162322290.969@tea.blinkenlights.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:23:11PM +0100, Sten Spans wrote.. > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 12:19:11AM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote.. > >>Folks, > >> > >>I am getting the strong impression that there is something hosed > >>related to ATA at least on the DS10 and DS10L. Test installs > >>on ATA disks work fine, but the first boot of the installed disk > >>fails miserably, typically the symptom is that the first shell won't > >>start or similar. I got: > >> > >>Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0a > >>/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libc.so.6: Unsupported relocation type > >>1611047936 > >>in non-PLT relocations > >> > >>Observed on one DS10 and one DS10L. The problem does not > >>occur when you use a SCSI disk (which I typically do so I missed this > >>before). > >> > >>Those of you who own this machine type and have a spare IDE drive, > >>can you please test it? Other reports for different system models > >>are interesting too of course. > > > >A check of 5.5-BETA1 would be interesting too. > > I'll give it a go this weekend on my ds10 > (which also normally runs scsi :) Looks like it is not only DS10, my 164SX has similar probs as well. 5.5-BETA1 and 6.1-BETA1 have it. In total we have seen it on 2 DS10L, one DS10 and a 164SX now. SCSI is just fine. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060216225244.GC49268>