Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 05:09:30 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers), isdn@muc.ditec.de (Distribution List; FreeBSD ISDN) Subject: Re: ISDN: "modem" or board? (Was: Microsoft "Get ISDN"?) Message-ID: <14217.827327370@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Mar 1996 10:25:13 %2B0700." <199603200927.KAA12870@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Of course, it would be really nice if you waited Teles out so you > >> could test the ISDN stuff in the US :) > > > >: -) I'm willing if they are! > > Why don't you just contact them and ask them what the difference is. > If, as I suspect, it's just the CAPI, you can use the German versions > just as easily, since, as Gary says, we don't use any steenkin' CAPI. I did, and they said it was an electrical incompatibility with the NT1. Whatever that means! > Does your Telco supply DSS1? Erm.. I'm afraid I don't know what that means. I only know that I have a Northern Telcom DMS series switch and the TA appears to "log in" with it successfully. I didn't set up anything specifically. > > Everyone from Motorola to ADTRAN seems to go the "home made" route, so.. > > How come they can work together? Or is this an incorrect assumption > on my part? I've always been told that Motorola and ADTRAN TAs will talk to one another but will _not_ bond the channels, at least according to my friend at Cisco. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14217.827327370>