Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 06:56:10 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: man.cgi links in FAQ Message-ID: <20000722065610.N64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20000721185451.H66732@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20000721185451.H66732@nathan.ruhr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:26:57PM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote: > >> Ditto for ports.cgi links? I guess <application> would be a suitable >> replacement for a lot of those. > > Either <application> or <command>, we don't have the necessary &man.foo.x; > entities for them. I think we can add them... No-one has shot me for adding a w3m(1) entity yet, anyway, and there's already some ports man.foo entities (cvsup(1) for example). -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D FreeBSD Documentation Project / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000722065610.N64132>