Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:51:23 +0200
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Thomas Sparrevohn <Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com>
Subject:   Re: Some comments on ZFS
Message-ID:  <200704172251.33377.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <200704172137.11184.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com>
References:  <200704171143.l3HBhDZB008693@peedub.jennejohn.org> <200704172137.11184.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart27369945.4msuNq8cIk
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 17 April 2007 22:37, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 12:43:13 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > Robert Watson writes:
> >
> > Interestingly enough, I see less memory pressure since switching to
> > ZFS. But I'm not using RAIDZ. Previously ``make buildworld'' would
> > use much more memory, probably for buffer caching. It looks like ZFS
> > doesn't use nearly as much buffer cache as UFS (which may not be a
> > good thing).
>
> On this system 4GB system - 2,3GB available - ZFS stops around
> 1,3GB Free whereas UFS continues until app. 700MB mark on a
> buildworld
>
> But the price seems to be much more disk activity - Given that
> the difference - after disabling Witness - was
>
> UFS 10m32.10s real          27m1.32s user           7m49.01s sys   =20
> (Systat 700MB Free) ZFS  17m43.66s real          27m30.70s user       =20
>  17m28.47s sys  (Systat 1,3GB Free)
>
> It make me think that ZFS is trading memory for performance - my guess
> is - that given the same memory usage ZFS would be unbeatable - I must
> say that Pawel has done a great job porting ZFS

I have reverted the 3/4 -> 1/2 arc size limit locally, which gives better=20
results in my test: playing hd video off the same disk while doing a=20
(single threaded) buildworld from the same zpool (single disk, no mirror,=20
no raidz).  With the 1/2 limit, I get frequent hick-ups in the playback -=20
while with 3/4 things run (almost) smoothly.

=2D-=20
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

--nextPart27369945.4msuNq8cIk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGJTNVXyyEoT62BG0RAlIlAJ0SNN5l5aVD0Jgr73ueujocU98ixQCfab+P
5WztqX9y9yN68vHOZDk7wTY=
=K0So
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart27369945.4msuNq8cIk--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704172251.33377.max>