Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:51:31 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 7ae879b14a20 - main - kern_procctl(): convert the function to be table-driven Message-ID: <202110192051.19JKpV66059807@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <91ebf9d8-5547-8570-18cb-26a58baf89ba@FreeBSD.org> References: <202110192004.19JK4jN3069844@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <202110192035.19JKZDqM026085@slippy.cwsent.com> <91ebf9d8-5547-8570-18cb-26a58baf89ba@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <91ebf9d8-5547-8570-18cb-26a58baf89ba@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin wri tes: > On 10/19/21 1:35 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <202110192004.19JK4jN3069844@gitrepo.freebsd.org>, Konstantin > > Belous > > ov writes: > >> The branch main has been updated by kib: > >> > >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=7ae879b14a2086df521c59c4a379d > 3a0 > >> 72e08bc6 > >> > >> commit 7ae879b14a2086df521c59c4a379d3a072e08bc6 > >> Author: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> > >> AuthorDate: 2021-10-15 18:57:17 +0000 > >> Commit: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> > >> CommitDate: 2021-10-19 20:04:34 +0000 > >> > >> kern_procctl(): convert the function to be table-driven > >> > >> Reviewed by: emaste, markj > >> Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation > >> MFC after: 1 week > >> Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32513 > >> --- > >> sys/kern/kern_procctl.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > ---- > >> -- > >> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_procctl.c b/sys/kern/kern_procctl.c > >> index eb36f0822938..90c5e63c7219 100644 > >> --- a/sys/kern/kern_procctl.c > >> +++ b/sys/kern/kern_procctl.c > >> @@ -949,7 +957,14 @@ kern_procctl(struct thread *td, idtype_t idtype, id_t > id > >> , int com, void *data) > >> error = EINVAL; > >> break; > >> } > >> - if (tree_locked) > >> - sx_unlock(&proctree_lock); > >> + > >> + switch (cmd_info->lock_tree) { > >> + case SA_XLOCKED: > >> + sx_xunlock(&proctree_lock); > >> + break; > >> + case SA_SLOCKED: > >> + sx_sunlock(&proctree_lock); > >> + break; > >> + } > >> return (error); > >> } > >> > > > > Should SA_* in fact be LA_*? SA_* in sys/sx.h assumes INVARIANTS whereas > > LA_* in sys/lock.h has no such requirement. > > Both are for "assertions". The LA_* constants aren't really public but are > the values used for witness_assert() that various foo_assert() routines in > locking APIs (mtx_assert/sx_assert, etc.) can use. For locking APIs, the > type-specific macros are the ones you use, e.g. SA_* with sx_assert(). > > Given that, SA_* is the closest match here. We'll need some #ifdefs for non-INVARIANTS built kernels, as it stands buildkernel is broken. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202110192051.19JKpV66059807>