Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:32:21 -0200 From: "Ricardo A. Reis" <ricardo_bsd@yahoo.com.br> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: "Ricardo A. Reis" <ricardo@dis.epm.br>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jails QOS. Message-ID: <43CF78C5.90108@yahoo.com.br> In-Reply-To: <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org> References: <43CE30D3.8010706@dis.epm.br> <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian, > it seems from reading it that openVZ is closer to: > Marco Zec's "Vimage" project ( http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/ ) > than to plain jails. Thanks by the attention on my question, After read this url i think "it is that" :-), but this project is for old 4.x and not is maintained by official FreBSD Project, i don't like the use patch for many reason and one example is a patch for multiple ip address in jail (http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/jail_2005020101.patch). The virtualization is for me the unique path, reading the presentation in eurobsdcon 2002, i have a question .. When a many numbers of the vimage caused performance degradation ? I have a plan to introduce a many jails for VPS (Virtual Private Server) in University , but i have large DB with this is possible scale one or more vimage ? > I would like to be able to work out how to make vimage "extensible" > and suitable for > inclusion in a production system because it is very cool. > Introduce this project in default system is very like , i like the work on this but i don't have more time for another's projects. Thanks Ricardo A. Reis UNIFESP Unix and Network Admin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43CF78C5.90108>