Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:08:44 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] Message-ID: <BFDC2DD5BE7368CED903D80F@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050728205049.GA28459@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <C3B81AFDB8A5DFB5AB566CC4@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <FACB47A35BF38243FBC04766@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050728205049.GA28459@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On Thursday, July 28, 2005 16:50:49 -0400 Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > The rule is in place for *new ports* to make submitters take > responsibility that their new ports actually work, and so that when a > broken port is added to the tree, someone knows they are on the hook > to fix the problems that appear with it, whether they are submitted by > me, or other users of FreeBSD. > > It is *very common* for new ports to not work as committed (for > various reasons that I can go into if you like), and it is often > necessary for a few rounds of fixes to be developed and committed > before all problems are resolved. > > The rule became necessary after too many ports were committed in a > broken and unusable state, and the submitters and committers refused > to address the issues because they assumed that "someone else would > fix them". That's pretty irresponsible, and such ports in the tree > waste my time and waste the time of other FreeBSD users, so this > behaviour is no longer allowed. > > The bottom line is that if you care enough to submit a port for > FreeBSD, you need to care enough to make sure you submit a *working* > port to FreeBSD, and that means you list yourself as maintainer at > least for the first month or so until it is clear that there are no > outstanding problems with the port. After then, you can drop > maintainership if you really don't want to continue to support the > FreeBSD community in this way. > Thanks, Kris, that makes a great deal of sense. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BFDC2DD5BE7368CED903D80F>