Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 06:32:01 -0800 From: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> To: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AW: Question Update Java Security Updates Message-ID: <AANLkTikk7jyNnw1nS7K4jgCXpSeZ0oUMVZ1VyO-N9mMJ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110310161721.59652106566B@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20110310120028.6013310656B0@hub.freebsd.org> <20110310161721.59652106566B@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> wrote: > > The reason for that is that they haven't been necessary. =A0This cannot b= e > said for openjdk, not yet at least. > There have been 191 "vulnerabilities" for the lifetime of JDK 1.6, according to Secunia. java/jdk16 is at update 4 out of 24. Unless you are running only trusted local apps with no networking support, that is highly dubious. --=20 Rob Farmer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikk7jyNnw1nS7K4jgCXpSeZ0oUMVZ1VyO-N9mMJ>