Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:41:55 +0100 From: Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: df with ZFS vs. zpool list Message-ID: <4EEA0733.7060104@frank.uvena.de> In-Reply-To: <20111215143957.b2f30a13.cyb.@gmx.net> References: <4EE9F405.6000103@frank.uvena.de> <20111215143957.b2f30a13.cyb.@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 15.12.2011 14:39, schrieb Andreas Rudisch: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:20:05 +0100 > Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de> wrote: > >> I'm a bit confused about a thing. I did create a zpool using >> zpool create storage ada1 ada2 ada3 > >> storage 145G 42k 145G 0% /storage > >> freebsd-test# zpool list >> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT >> storage 222G 9.10M 222G 0% 1.00x ONLINE - > >> P.P.S. >> freebsd-test# zpool status >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> storage ONLINE 0 0 0 > >> raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ^^^^^^ >> ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> ada2 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> ada3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > everything look fine. The pool consists of 3 80GB hds, on them you > created a RAIDZ1 filesystem. In your case a third of the pool is used > for parity information. Seems to make sense. Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers, Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EEA0733.7060104>