Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:00:10 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <20040816125929.N32601@pooker.samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20040816185300.GD55862@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200408161817.i7GIHEdR017974@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040816182324.GA7046@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20040816183545.GB33984@ip.net.ua> <20040816185300.GD55862@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:35:45PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:23:24AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:17:14PM +0000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > ru 2004-08-16 18:17:14 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > > > . Makefile.inc1 > > > > Log: > > > > sys/boot seems to compile fine on Alpha; unbreak ``make release''. > > > > > > DANGER! Building is not the problem. Booting is... > > > > I asked Wilko to check if new /boot/loader is having issues. > > If it does, my commit should be backed out. > > The old loader won't boot, but does build. Your commit should likely not > be backed out either way as something needs to be done about it now that > the release is here. If we can fix the loader that would be great. If > not, I'll import a uuencoded binary copy of the 5.2.1 Alpha loader. > I concur here. I'm most concerned about the tree being buildable at the moment. Since Alpha is not tier-1, it is not a hard requirement that it boot at the moment. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040816125929.N32601>