Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:29:21 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, mbr@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r195200 - in head/usr.sbin: . wake Message-ID: <9bbcef730906301429h2d80b4f3uc166337305c533eb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0E6D4FB2-A485-40ED-A856-ACC311A90EFE@msys.ch> References: <200906301851.n5UIpNJQ089171@svn.freebsd.org> <20090630.133608.-1703974521.imp@bsdimp.com> <0E6D4FB2-A485-40ED-A856-ACC311A90EFE@msys.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/6/30 Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch>: > > Am 30.06.2009 um 21:36 schrieb M. Warner Losh: > >> wake really is too generic a name for this. =C2=A0Why didn't the wol por= t >> get committed anyway, it seems to be better than this... > > wake is a short, mnemonic and imperative name that describes what the > command does. It is exactly the same command as in NetBSD. "wake(8)" seems more complementary to "zzz(8)" :) +1 for the tool, -1 for the name.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730906301429h2d80b4f3uc166337305c533eb>