Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:05:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/osf1 osf1_signal.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209301404060.82116-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020930135948.A41526@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > I should mention that signal delivery is now decidedly almost LIFO, and > will be fully LIFO once everything uses a ksiginfo, and not a signal > number... Right now it's almost racey, which leaves it undefined, but > it's mostly like... [keep in mind the proc lock must be held, so there > is no race, and it is defined, but...] > 1. Check the signal queue... > 2. Pop a signal number off... The most recently recv'd... > 3. Dequeue the first signal we find with that signo... > 4. Send it... IF IT'S A tailq, why isn't it FIFO? would it make a difference to have one queue per type? > -- > Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve > Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger jmallett@FreeBSD.org > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/ | Support my FreeBSD hacking! > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0209301404060.82116-100000>