Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:43:40 -0600 From: Chris Watson <bsdunix44@gmail.com> To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net> Subject: Re: push a few config files to dozen or so servers Message-ID: <5E827979-9DD3-4C1E-870A-7EB727EAA3BA@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6CC9FCD8-EB12-4DD1-A76E-8F43C044340F@ultra-secure.de> References: <20150205130234.3fcbabfb@efreet.mimar.rs> <op.xtk288tykndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> <54D37932.7010808@madpilot.net> <20150205154743.GO88387@mail0.byshenk.net> <3552828A-536D-41AB-B56D-F47AA4164A79@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <6CC9FCD8-EB12-4DD1-A76E-8F43C044340F@ultra-secure.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's what I settled on. Simple, secure, push style, central management. Th= e last thing I have time for is learning another ugly config setup for anoth= er tool. The config for ansible is clean IMO and really easy (compared to ch= ef and salt and puppet). Granted I'm not using it for managing 100,000 boxes= but it works great for me. It runs securely with ssh and quite fast. The ot= her tools just give me a headache, you can tell engineers wrote them. FreeBS= D support is fairly decent. For instance it supports jails and package manag= ement.=20 Chris=20 Open Systems Inc.=20 Sent from my iPhone 5 >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve always wanted to try ansible, which looks like it has decent s= upport for FreeBSD. >=20 > Anybody got experience with that? >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E827979-9DD3-4C1E-870A-7EB727EAA3BA>