Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 13:41:48 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> To: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: man.cgi links in FAQ Message-ID: <20000722134148.L66732@nathan.ruhr.de> In-Reply-To: <20000722065610.N64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>; from ben@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 06:56:10AM %2B0100 References: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20000721185451.H66732@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000722065610.N64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 06:56:10AM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote: > I think we can add them... No-one has shot me for adding a w3m(1) > entity yet, anyway, and there's already some ports man.foo entities > (cvsup(1) for example). And jade is able to handle large numbers of entities. I've added almost 3300[1] entities to my local copy of man-refs.ent and I'm still able to build the FAQ and the handbook. The effect on the build time is minimal. make clean;time make in /usr/doc/en.../books/handbooks yields: First run: with complete set of entites (3514) real 2m59.574s user 2m55.689s sys 0m0.978s Second run: only the standard entites (220) real 2m57.580s user 2m55.323s sys 0m0.931s The ports tree shouldn't add more than another 5K entities. You could try to harvest the man entities from bento. /s/Udo [1] 3294, to be exact. Ok, entities like &man...1; (for "[(1)"), &man.g...1; (for g++(1)) or &man...syscall.2; for "__syscall(2)" look strange. Unfortunately, neither [ nor + are allowed in entity names. -- I have learned over the years, that if it is the truth you seek, then honesty on your own part, is the best policy. That and torture. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000722134148.L66732>