Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 20:45:08 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: "Toll, Eric" <etoll@vipstructures.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Glitch Message-ID: <20050510184508.GA92903@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D2D@VIP10-WIN2K> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D2D@VIP10-WIN2K>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:40:31PM -0400, Toll, Eric wrote: > Thanks again for your help. I now have the following (Both CPU's and AGP= !) > Cool. >=20 > I'm not overly concerned with the following chunk: >=20 > "unknown: I/O range not supported > unknown: I/O range not supported > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_.= _CRS] > (Node 0xffffff000080c440), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT > ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_.= _CRS] > (Node 0xffffff000080c440), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT > can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_ - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT" >=20 > As everything seems to work fine: Disk, network processors, and video. > Should I be concerned with this? No I have the same warnings on some of my machines, probably a flakey ACPI implentation in the BIOS, but if everything works, I wouldn't be bothered about it. The machines I maintain that have it are very stable... (maybe because none of the use lpc0 or a printer anyhow.) Marc --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCgQE0ezjnobFOgrERApI5AJ977MwRugCtKgi4YocbPNbvLf93pwCgjJ1C 6r3qShIJ5I4aRPagsE2yk5M= =U07g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050510184508.GA92903>