Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:38:22 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, kamalp@acm.org Subject: Re: JFS2 on freebsd Message-ID: <200509092038.22814.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <ac7deb505090900014b651d68@mail.gmail.com> References: <E1ECemU-0004dI-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f26.mail.ru> <20050909005412.GC14575@wantadilla.lemis.com> <ac7deb505090900014b651d68@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1496870.3UvdOugYUE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 09 September 2005 16:31, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? Core doesn't decide what stuff gets committed into FreeBSD. Core doesn't control who writes things, or what they write, for FreeBSD. If you write it, and it works well enough and you are prepared to maintain = it,=20 it will almost certainly be committed. =46reeBSD works from the ground up, not the other way around. If you want i= t,=20 write it :) PS I am not a core member :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1496870.3UvdOugYUE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDIW0m5ZPcIHs/zowRAuajAKCTJ99xOYMc5Y4iy05i0Jby4BCspgCeOsJ7 rrky6UJhlZVypi71TGkuE4s= =eYnC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1496870.3UvdOugYUE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509092038.22814.doconnor>