Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Dec 1998 23:16:46 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu>
To:        spork <spork@super-g.com>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NFS thoughts
Message-ID:  <19981226231646.C19562@nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com>; from spork on Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 11:13:03AM -0500
References:  <19981214073605.20458@cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Can anyone else help confirm that in general 2/udp is the most dependable
> way to run if you're not traversing anything slower than 100Mb?  

Have you tried 3/udp or 2/tcp to see if the problem is with the transport
port (ie. UDP/TCP) or the NFS protocol?

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com  -or-  obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981226231646.C19562>