Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 23:16:46 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu> To: spork <spork@super-g.com>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS thoughts Message-ID: <19981226231646.C19562@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com>; from spork on Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 11:13:03AM -0500 References: <19981214073605.20458@cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Can anyone else help confirm that in general 2/udp is the most dependable > way to run if you're not traversing anything slower than 100Mb? Have you tried 3/udp or 2/tcp to see if the problem is with the transport port (ie. UDP/TCP) or the NFS protocol? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981226231646.C19562>