Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 22:57:26 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Evan Champion" <evanc@synapse.net> Cc: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, "Ollivier Robert" <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/i386/conf LINT src/sys/i386/i386 autoconf.c src/sys/kern init_main.c init_sys Message-ID: <601.886197446@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:55:29 EST." <015201bd2dc9$c7e51f00$2844c00a@cello.synapse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The only thing wrong is that nobody ever made it work... If somebody does that, I'll be the first to welcome it back. Poul-Henning In message <015201bd2dc9$c7e51f00$2844c00a@cello.synapse.net>, "Evan Champion" writes: >>I was supposed to. LFS has fallen out of favor of alot of people who >>supposedly "know." > >Hum... Considering LFS has never worked, I wonder who it fell out of favour >with? For almost every 4.4BSD user, it was never an option to begin with. >Unless it fell out of favour for not working :-) > >Having to wait 30 minutes for my servers to fsck sure makes LFS a pretty >appealing idea to me, and it's really too bad that it has been shelved. If >there's something physically wrong with the LFS and someone has a better >idea, that's one thing, but otherwise I hope someone is able to resurrect >LFS soon... > >Evan > > > -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?601.886197446>