Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:05:40 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: ark@eltex.ru Cc: jkb@best.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, john@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru, john@unt.edu Subject: Re: Are we vulnerable to "stealth" port scans? Message-ID: <199809212207.PAA21291@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199809211427.SAA01013@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> from "ark@eltex.ru" at Sep 21, 98 06:27:21 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from ark@eltex.ru, sie said: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > nuqneH, > > (darren's patch skipped) > seems to have no effect for "FIN" scans like nmap.c does. err, there are/were two patches to apply but if tcp_input() has changed much on FreeBSD, then the second may be incorrect. they were tested on NetSBD-1.3G and produced the desired results. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809212207.PAA21291>