Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:09:26 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Alex Kapranoff <kapr@acm.org> Cc: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Building only a specified list of kernel modules Message-ID: <200103261709.f2QH9Q937241@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:45:25 %2B0400." <20010325234525.B484@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> References: <20010325234525.B484@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> <20010324211140.C4304@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010324205005.D777@nebula.cybercable.fr> <20010325101657.A36335@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010325120046.F777@nebula.cybercable.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010325234525.B484@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> Alex Kapranoff writes: : Hm? You usually don't have a box with all the hundred NICS supported by : FreeBSD EXCEPT FOR ONE, but instead a box with one or several NICS so : that all other if_* modules waste your '/'. Same about snd_* drivers. It : seems to be more practical to have a list of needed modules. I have a : patch almost identical to Peter's in my tree for about a month and it : speeds up kernel builds by a factor of 2 or more. Alex, did you see my simplified patches? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103261709.f2QH9Q937241>