Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 May 2018 17:11:58 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Jonathan Looney <jonlooney@gmail.com>
Cc:        hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info>, Randall Stewart <rrs@freebsd.org>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r332770 - in head/sys: conf netinet netinet/tcp_stacks sys
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfpM8iFO5T79_mHzaTGPZsg=4YkUhctKQdHxXMxNGiqjEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADrOrmuVuSV2y3DRVxDfD7xT46rMkcEj19X1MQhSwVa%2BSZs6ng@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201804191338.w3JDc0to002106@repo.freebsd.org> <20180430071646.GE3653@strugglingcoder.info> <CADrOrmuVuSV2y3DRVxDfD7xT46rMkcEj19X1MQhSwVa%2BSZs6ng@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Jonathan Looney <jonlooney@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:16 AM, hiren panchasara <
> hiren@strugglingcoder.info> wrote:
> >
> > In my understanding, default stack currently cannot use this mechanism.
> When do
> > you think that'll be possible?
>
>
> I think I can speak to Randall's plans for this.
>
> Randall chose not to include in this commit the hooks for the default
> stack to use the high-precision timers. I believe his immediate priorities
> are upstreaming RACK and BBR. After that, if there is demand, he may
> upstream the (relatively untested) code that allows the default stack to
> use the high-precision timers (protected by a non-default kernel option) so
> others can choose to experiment with it.
>
> (By the way, we're hoping to change the terminology away from describing
> the traditional FreeBSD stack as the "default" stack. In theory, someone
> can make any stack be their local default. We'll need to figure out what to
> actually call it at some point. My suggestion was the "FreeBSD" stack,
> although that is lacking in some imagination. In any case, we should have
> that discussion at some point in the future.
>

Only slightly less poor would be "traditional" stack :)

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpM8iFO5T79_mHzaTGPZsg=4YkUhctKQdHxXMxNGiqjEw>