Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 22:37:01 +0100 From: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>, Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/src and /usr/ports not git directories ? Message-ID: <CAFYkXjk7PPHNiTJftGo980DABOO0t-rK9t%2BoPnLY-5n%2B1qjEAg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoHUsZusqMg_gWN5mB9P3xByGv_GfELi9Dd63CHto1igw@mail.gmail.com> References: <Z4vk3009iSwuzG4K@www.zefox.net> <Z4__B0EQM-ce0qPE@cell.glebi.us> <C509F94C-2AC2-414F-90C0-355C69869D72@ketas.si.pri.ee> <Z5AQ1GcwX_MZw69G@www.zefox.net> <CANCZdfoHUsZusqMg_gWN5mB9P3xByGv_GfELi9Dd63CHto1igw@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:29 PM Warner Losh wrote: > (..) > I think we should replace the populate /usr/src from a tarball with.... populate it > with a tarball that represents a 1-deep checkout tree at the rev we built the release > from. This lets users have the source, has minimal overhead and also lets users update > or turn the shallow checkout into a deep one, etc. A shallow checkout is quite a bit > less than a full tree, though still more than just the raw files. I've not done poking to > see size comparisons. Still having tarball of src and ports snapshots in the full release images is important to have, users could select which one they want to use, that seems best solution :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.infohome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjk7PPHNiTJftGo980DABOO0t-rK9t%2BoPnLY-5n%2B1qjEAg>