Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:28:30 -0600 From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen .. Message-ID: <200012201528.JAA15116@guild.plethora.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:25:36 GMT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012201120480.436-100000@kai.qix.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012201120480.436-100000@kai.qix.co.uk>, Aled Morris writes: >Shouldn't you use "kill(0, SIGSEGV)" ? Gratuitously verbose! raise(SIGSEGV); (To be fair, raise(SIGSEGV) is quite likely to just jump to the segfault handler without actually setting any signal bits, but who can tell?[*]) -s [*] I don't have a FreeBSD complete source tree handy, this is a general comment about arbitrary future libc implementations. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012201528.JAA15116>