Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:13:34 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html Message-ID: <4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 08/30/11 09:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>> This website should be brushed up or taken offline! >>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html >> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os >> comparison, like: >> >> = Networking = >> * IPv6: major support, best stack around. >> * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. >> ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). >> >> = Data storage = >> * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux >> has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has >> dynamic disks since XP (?features). >> >> = SMP = >> * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some >> rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like >> DragonflyBSD and QNX). >> > And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which > those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. > > --HPS > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" What's about DTrace? = Development/System Profiling = * DTrace: Some notes of the Kernel Gurus what this could mean for performance profiling and development = Licensing Model = * Some striking comments on the advantage for companies or interested people of the BSD-like licensing model over the GPLv3 on which Linux is based now and which has serious implications for those who wants to develop and sell software developed on/with GNU stuff. it would be very honest, if we do not only emphasize only the pros. BSD came from the academic environment, that was where I met it the first time and I appreciated the way things were developed and 'sloppyness' was a nogo. So we should keep it up and a serious and honest set of contraru points for all compared OS should be appreciable. Does the VM of FreeBSD still have advantges (measurable) over Linux?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5CA9BE.2020005>