Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:14:52 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com, eischen@vigrid.com, osa@freebsd.org.ru Subject: Re: Mysql segfaults; is the culprit libstdc++, pthread, regex ...? Message-ID: <20001206091452.C2367@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012061848340.45150-200000@iclub.nsu.ru>; from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:06:04PM %2B0600 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012061352580.34735-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012061848340.45150-200000@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:06:04PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> now I can confirm that on latest -stable without "linking shared objects
> with libgcc_[r]_pic" changes ACE wrappers tests run correctly without
> segfaults. test program ("bad" one) from PR/23252 also does not segfault
> anymore.
> sorry, no workaround so far except backing out that changes
> (patch for testing attached) and have no time to find more correct
> solution.
Lets get the patch right for people to test. Remove all the bogus
-kthread stuff. As that was only for Linux threads (or does ACE use
that)?? If so, then it isn't being linked the way Jason Evans says it
should.
> I think that changes to compiler and binutils should be tested
> in -current for much longer period of time before MFC and should be MFC'ed
> long before release date.
If you understood what was broken by not doing this commit, you'd
understand why it was done. C++ exceptions (even w/o threads) was rather
broken. W/o this patch we were going to dropped as a GCC 3.0 release
test platform.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001206091452.C2367>