Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:12:25 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com> Cc: 'Liste FreeBSD' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Backup strategy for zfs + jail Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201172310530.3856@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <03a501ccd562$5b2f4e80$118deb80$@fisglobal.com> References: <885A2A83-A6FF-4E03-AB67-09BE0D2E557E@todoo.biz> <03a501ccd562$5b2f4e80$118deb80$@fisglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> --> Efficiency >> --> Compatibility with ZFS >> >> > > If you're running 9, give HAST a shot. maybe a stupid question but what is a practical difference between hast and doing ggate+gmirror and setting "prefer" load balancing to local disk?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1201172310530.3856>