Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:24:11 +0000 From: Miguel Ramos <miguel@anjos.strangled.net> To: Thomas Franck <TAFranck@gmx.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 NICs, SMP, weird kernel ARP messages Message-ID: <1140189851.907.11.camel@dual.anjos.strangled.net> In-Reply-To: <43F5EF0A.31646.16880A2@TAFranck.gmx.net> References: <43F5E134.2791.13277DF@TAFranck.gmx.net> <43F5EF0A.31646.16880A2@TAFranck.gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sex, 2006-02-17 ās 15:43 +0100, Thomas Franck escreveu: > > Unless you take special measures (ng_fec?), one does not > > normally connect two NICs on one machine to the same collision > > domain. > > Hmm.. don't really see a problem with that.. two NICs with > diffent IP on the same subnet.. binding say, a webserver and a > database to different NICs... takes load off the single NIC, > giving 100MBit to each service... > If they're on the same collision domain, then you're not giving 100Mbps to each service, that would be good. That's why it usually doesn't make sense (I understand that this is a temporary configuration...). You can have two IP addresses on the same NIC anyway... > > By default, some other hardware (like Suns), will even use the > > same MAC address for every NIC on the machine.... > > Uhh.. that's nasty.. :) > Not so nasty, since there's really no point in having more than one NIC on the same segment. And the log message is justifiable. Sorry for my intrusion. Miguel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1140189851.907.11.camel>