Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 23:36:39 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> To: Omar Thameen <omar@clifford.inch.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-97:04.procfs Message-ID: <199708282136.XAA06146@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: Omar Thameen's message of Thu, 28 Aug 1997 10:29:57 -0400 References: <199708261803.UAA00666@gvr.gvr.org> <19970828102957.48802@clifford.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What's the official word on whether 2.1.7 is vulnerable? I know below > says that 2.1.* is, but the previous discussion indicated that it was > not. I personally haven't gotten the exploit to work, but I may be doing > something wrong. The exploit need to be tailored for each branch. 2.1 is vulnerable. Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708282136.XAA06146>