Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:32:39 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: David Xu <davidx@viasoft.com.cn>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: add some constraints in cpufunc.h Message-ID: <20011129153238.A782@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011121113835.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:38:35AM -0800 References: <00e701c17264$a4617130$ef01a8c0@davidwnt> <XFMail.011121113835.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:38:35AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 21-Nov-01 David Xu wrote:
> > 4.4-stable, file sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h,
> >
> > --- cpufunc.h.orig Wed Nov 21 13:35:36 2001
> > +++ cpufunc.h Wed Nov 21 15:00:12 2001
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> > {
> > u_int result;
> >
> > - __asm __volatile("bsfl %0,%0" : "=r" (result) : "0" (mask));
> > + __asm __volatile("bsfl %0,%0" : "=r" (result) : "0" (mask) : "cc");
> > return (result);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
> > {
> > u_int result;
> >
> > - __asm __volatile("bsrl %0,%0" : "=r" (result) : "0" (mask));
> > + __asm __volatile("bsrl %0,%0" : "=r" (result) : "0" (mask) : "cc");
> > return (result);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
> > u_int result;
> >
> > __asm __volatile("xorl %0,%0; xchgl %1,%0"
> > - : "=&r" (result) : "m" (*addr));
> > + : "=&r" (result) : "m" (*addr) : "cc");
> > return (result);
> > }
> >
>
> Have you had actual bugs as a result of "cc" not being in the constraints?
>
> If so, there's a _lot_ more places that need this. All the atomic ops, for
> example.
How about PR gnu/32365? I know next to nothing about assembler opcodes,
if "cc" would fix the PR, then the PR is a demonstration of an actual bug.
G'luck,
Peter
--
I am the thought you are now thinking.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011129153238.A782>