Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 03:58:19 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Importing tsearch routines. Message-ID: <20000701035819.G25571@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <20000701124831.V307@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from asmodai@wxs.nl on Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:48:31PM %2B0200 References: <20000630153151.J275@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000701111344.S307@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20000701034355.F25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000701124831.V307@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> [000701 03:49] wrote: > -On [20000701 12:46], Alfred Perlstein (bright@wintelcom.net) wrote: > >ack! they are, in libcompat! (except the t* stuff) > > > >Does this mean they ought to be put back into libc? removed from > >libcompat as well? It's somewhat confusing, Solaris seems to have > >all this stuff available in the mainline libc, should we as well? > > It's a choice of whether we want to adhere to standards or not. I am > more in favor of doing so. > > I think we are a good platform for serious developers to target and > standards like SUSv2 come in handy on a lot of fronts. Shall we repo copy the files from libcompat and remove the libcompat references from the manpages? I'm pretty sure that as long as they don't exist in both libraries (libc and libcompat) applications shouldn't have a problem. Peter? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000701035819.G25571>